Wednesday, November 11, 2009



     The Pink Pony Stripclub in Daytona Beach, Florida        (HC)


Major Hasan, the alleged sole gunman in the Fort Hood Massacre, is now being revealed as a frequant customer of a local Texas stripclub, where he somehow found time to visit in between work and his multiple visits to his local Mosque. This, after reports that Major Hasan worshipped at the same Virginia Mosque as some of the 9-11 terrorists, and was allegedly trying to contact Al Quida according to hearsay unnamed sources who are allegedly connected to the FBI. And despite how foolish it now looks, all the DHS and the Army seemed concerned with is diversity in wake of the shootings. Now, Hasan is alleged to have taken another page from the same playbook as the so-called 9-11 terrorists.  Fox News reported the following:

"The Army psychiatrist authorities say killed 13 people and wounded 29 others at the Fort Hood Army Base Thursday was a recent and frequent customer at a local strip club, employees of the club told exclusively." Note-this would normally be a non-story, because what someone does in their private time should be their own business.  But this is not the first time a so-called devout, religious Muslim that has been accused of mass murder by the mainstream media. Why Fox news would think that an employee reporting that Hasan preferred blondes is somehow newsworthy is beyond me, but this appears to be as much as an attempt to show hypocrisy or connect Hasan to the 9-11 terrorists by inference as it is a news story.

Where have we heard this all before? No, not Jimmy Swaggart (but close). The 9-11 highjackers, all supposed devout Muslims, were reported as visiting several strip clubs from California to Florida, and several places in between. The most infamous visit of all was the alleged Pink Pony Stripclub event by Mohammed Atta and others who are alleged to have been drunk and bragging about what they were about to do. And, of course, at least one account had them leaving a Koran behind in the club. But this was hardly the only case of Muslims terrorists being connected to strip clubs and pornography.

Remember, some of the hallmarks of disinformation is that it smears by mere association and conflicts to cause uncertainty and confusion. Disinformation is best when it is allegedly "leaked" on a day by day basis for that "drip, drip, drip" effect. By the time its over its all you can do to lift your hands over your head and give up, having been washed over by waves and waves of things that conflict yet eventually merge together.  Who knows if this story is factual or created, but the drip, drip, drip effect with all of this information is undeniable.

 The History Commons website reported that 9-11 Hijacker Jarrah stayed in Jacksonville, Florida for unknown reasons several times, and frequented a local stripclub there:

"After returning to the US for the fifth time, 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah flies immediately to Jacksonville, Florida, where he stays at the Ramada Inn for a week. He had previously visited Jacksonville (see January 22-26, 2001), as had Mohamed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi (see (October 2000)). While in Jacksonville, he frequents Wacko’s strip club. A worker there will later say that the FBI comes to the club after 9/11 to ask questions and show pictures “of the 9/11 terrorists,” and a dancer recognizes Jarrah from a photo line-up."

History Commons also reproduced an FBI spreadsheet listing many of these activities, including a report that  on July 4th to the 27th, certain highjackers spent hundreds of dollars on pono movies and sex toys, and in the days leading up to the attacks on 9-11, that certain hijackers paid for sex with prostitutes,  In fact, the entire timeline and spreadsheet are replete with examples of alleged contact between 9-11 terrorists and strip clubs or strippers. View the entire timeline by clicking here.

In fact, investigative journalist Daniel Hopsickler did a detailed investigation of the activities of Atta and the other terrorists and they stays in Florida, and even produced a video and book on the subject.

The Muslim terrorist meets stripper theme is one that is hardly new, the thing that many Hollywood subplots and even a novel titled, "The Unknown Terrorist" by Tasmanian born Richard Flanagan, and a novel based on a terrorist conducting research in a stripclub called "The Garden of the Last Days" by Andre Dubus, III. Regardless, one thing is for sure, the story on Hasan and the Fort Hood massacre is cut from the same cloth as the story behind the 9-11 Muslim terrorists that was fed to the public following 9-11. Whether this is the result of the same flawed, hypocritical Jihadi activities, or the byproduct of a clandestine intelligence operation gone amuk, only time will tell. Having close connections to those that were in crypto- intelligence or Marine special forces, I know that life is rarely black and white, and is sometimes shades of gray. And sometimes an operation is so in-your-face that they will leave an obvious calling card for those who wish to connect the dots between different events. It's too soon to tell, but things still do not add up.

And this 9-11 inference is so obvious that even some of the hard core conservative forums and blogs have put 2 and 2 together, however, it never occurs to these people that this could be simply the same card being played again by whoever wants to exploit this event and fear of muslim terrorists. At least they see what we all are seeing

Now it appears that one arm of the federal government is not shaking hands with the other. Which creates even more confusion. Stay tuned. The more they try and paint this as lone gunman tragedy, the more it looks more and more clandestine. Note: This posting can also be viewed at my website

Tuesday, November 10, 2009


The Los Angelas Times has done everyone who has been scratching their heads about the tragic Fort Hood massacre and the accused gunman Nidal Malik Hasan a big favor. The Times tracked down the suppossed Uncle of Major Hasan, who recently awoke from his coma and ventilator in a Texas hospital. 

The Uncle, Rafik Ismail Hasan, was found in the West Bank by a Times corrospondent.

For those who linked to the article above, it is clear the man in the picture has been crying. He tells the Times that the entire family is "in a state of denial", and that none of them believe he was capable of doing something like he is accused of. "I was amazed and shocked", the Uncle is quoted as saying. "It is not like him. He is very quiet, gentle."

That, by itself, would hardly be newsworthy, as most family members state something like the above. However, it's what the Uncle says later in the article that should start raising the red flags. Mr. Hasan states that although his nephew became more religious following his parent's death, it had nothing to do with political or radical identity:

     ""He never knew anything about politics," Hamad said. "He didn't know who is the president or the king of any Arab country. He's American. . . . He once told me, 'The chances I have in the United States I couldn't have in any other country in the world, so I appreciate what this country has done for me.' "

Hamad also said that while his nephew had complained about racial slurs, he seemed to be handling it well:

""He told me: 'They're ignorant. I'm more American than they are. I help my country more than they do. And I don't care what they say.' He felt sorry for them. He didn't feel grudges; he felt sympathy."

Mr. Hamad also noted that his nephew once grieved for three months when he rolled over during a nap and crushed his pet parakeet. Also, during medical school his switched to psychiatry because he fainted at the sight of blood while delivering a baby.  There is a nephew who is quoted in the article as well, who states that he had heard the same things from Major Hasan from the states.

The Uncle states that he would like to offer his condolences to the victims of the tragedy and apologize, and that if his nephew did what he is accused of, he must have snapped, and whatever caused it was big. There are references to the Doctor's increasing caseload, and how he was affected by the soldier's maladies.

"But for him, I don't know what I can do. If he wakes up, I want to ask him, 'Did you do it, and why?' I want to know. Otherwise, I have nothing to say to him." , the Uncle concludes.

Also see this related article from NPR (with transcript), "Fort Hood Shooting Stuns Hasan's Family".

Meanwhile, back in the States, the New York Times is reporting that the Fort Hood gunman gave signals before his rampage.  "But relatives and acquaintances say tensions that led to the rampage had been building for a long time. Investigators say Major Hasan bought the gun used in the massacre last summer, days after arriving at Fort Hood."

"In recent years, he had grown more and more vocal about his opposition to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and tortured over reconciling his military duties with his religion. He tried to get out of the Army, relatives said, and apparently believed it to be impossible, though experts say he was probably given inadequate advice."  The Times article reports.   This is like Alice in Wonderland, is it not?

The NY Times article stands in stark contrast to the LA Times article. Accoring to the Uncle pictured in the LA Times and NPR articles, and the nephew, Hasan was proud to be an American and in the Army, and they make no mention that he was trying (or suing) to get out of the Army. 

And it comes as no surprise that the NY Times article quotes anonymous sources and does not name the family members they are quoting. As posted here earlier last Friday, a supposed Aunt and bank president made a passing reference that Hasan was trying to get out of the country.  Yet the family is supposed to have been in shock and disbelief over this.  The Aunt was somehow made available before they had even reported that Hasan was anything other than dead.

Radio talkshow host and's Alex Jones has raised the issue of whether the Major was on Prozac or some other mood altering substance, as is often the case in shooting incidents like the Columbine High School shootings in Colorado. If the Major was indeed exhibiting signs of severe stress and conflict and was giving lectures on Islam and how the nonbelievers will be ultimately be beheaded (as reported in the media), and trying to get out of the Army, then the brass who promoted Hasan and ignored the warning signs need to be held to account, and even prosecuted under the UCMJ.  Their reckless disregard for the safety of the soldiers on this base, and the promotion of Hasan from Captain to Major, need to be called on to the carpet.  And last and not least, Senator Joe Lieberman has asked for a Congressional investigation on how these warning signs could have been ignored.

Ultimately, this all cannot possibly be resolved. Someone is mistaken, or lying, or stretching the truth, or writing from a script.  And consider this link to a quote from a SFC who was stationed at Ft. Hood for 10 years, who says "there is no way the official story is stinks to high heavens."  A whole plethora of oddities about the Ft. Hood shootings have been compiled here by Citizens for a Legitimate Government.

Meanwhile, as predicted here and by others on Friday, the MSM in now reporting that officials have concluded that Hasan was a lone gunman, and also that the FBI had been investigating Hasan for up to a year before the shootings, and determined he was no threat.  Hasan is also reportedly awake and talking to doctors and his lawyer.  The FBI will be investigating its own conduct in dropping the ball on Hasan, so expect heads to roll over that (not).

Several days later, heartbroken family members and questions of terrorism and stunned family members are still not resolved. And the story grows stranger and still does not add up. I fully expect some sort of confession to be attributed to Hasan, although many will wonder why the confession raises yet more questions than answers. Like I said, these tragedies follow a pattern, like an illness. It's part of the reason that many of the families from Columbine, Oklahoma City and 9-11 sued the federal government and other agencies. I hope this was just a random tragedy, but this appears to be something deeper (whether actual terrorism or made to look like terrorism). And, of course, we haven't even addressed to gunshop issues and the gun control cries that will come out of this.

Monday, November 9, 2009


Mr. Moss is the owner of Zenyatta, a very large and special filly who beat the colts and geldings in the Breeder's Cup  Classic this past weekend, an event promoted by the media as Zenyatta versus the boys. Rachel Alexandra, another special filly, beat the males in the Preakness and Woodward Stakes earlier this year. These events were very highly rated for a horse race. Moss is a wealthy, retired record executive who is friends with the rich and famous like Sting and Bill Gates. He named his horses, like Zenyatta and Tiago, off of Police album covers. So, Moss and his rich friends and the media can't help but use what went on in horse racing this year as a statement for the masses, right?

"Asked to address the social significance of what has turned out to be the Year of the Female in horse racing, Moss said:

“The social significance is apparent,” Moss said. “Women are as good as men. That's it. If not better on occasion. Go for it. Take it.” (NY Daily News, AP)

What follows is to Moss and anyone else who finds social lessons lurking in a horse race, from those like me who cringe when they hear such sweeping statements. It reaches far beyond horse racing, so even if you cannot stand the Sport of Kings, read on:

Great, the filly won. Can't we leave the human social engineering out of Zenyatta's victory?

And, typical of those in Moss's position, the mixed message: Z beating the males is a big deal, yet any girl is as good or better than a male and can beat them. Which is it? Obviously, Moss does not believe any girl can beat boys or Z would have taken on the boys a long time ago. Another rich white guy in the entertainment business who talks all progressive but acts another way entirely.

For those of you who wondered why the media and racing got behind Zenyatta and RA in such a fevorish pitch, the quote from Moss says it all.

Yeah women. Boo men. And, oh, let the good ol boys make tons of cash off of this because we are all fools.

And note in turf articles that RA and Zenyatta did not merely "win" their races or "beat" the boys; no, they "beat up" the boys, they "wiped the track" with them (actual quotes from the media). Why is that needed?

This sort of game is dangerously misinformed. The physical differences between men and women are more striking than between a filly and a colt. It is never ok to "beat up" the boys, or the girls. For the horseplayers and lovers of the sport, RA and Zenyatta were-and are great fillies who fought hard and beat the boys. For the rest of this bizarre society, it's another chance to show a woman beating up on inferior males. Why does it always have to be about that? Ask a tom girl who grew up being treated like one of the boys by her brothers if males and females are generally equal in competitive drama. Most will answer that the boys are much tougher, and they were toughened up by the boys.

Why can't we praise Z or RA without bashing the colts and geldings they beat, or males in general? I follow racing to escape the social engineering I know is going on in our society, a model designed to emasculate males while exalting women. Why do that? I suggest reading Machiavelli's "The Prince" to understand the importance of nuetering the males that one rules over. It's required reading for U.S. politicians.

A survey recently conducted by a U.S. Gov. funded company which questioned over 10,000 females aged 16-29 throughout this country, asked if them if men in that age group are as masculine, as male-like, as Gen-Xers (aged 30-48), 98 percent aswered "no", and that their aged male peers are more effeminate and are less likely to take charge in a dangerous situation. Twenty percent said they were physically superior to their boyfriends. And, of course, males (especially husbands) are portrayed on TV as bumbling boobs like Ray Ramono or Tim Allen on Home Improvement. Life imitates art.

So, excuse me Mr. Moss. The message that women are as good, if not better, than men has been drilled into everyone's head ad naseum. The message should be that Z is an exceptional filly that was better than any other horse regardless of gender.

If fillies were as good, if not better, at beating colts than any filly who raced colts would not need a weight break to level the playing field. If women were as good, if not better, than the men, then Serena Williams would be competitive against the best males (which she is not, just ask her). We would frown equally on domestic violence of any sort. But society does not, they villify men beating up women (as they should), but laud women who beat up men (who do not fight back).

Remember Lorraina Bobbit? She cut of her husband's you know what? It became a big joke. And then women wonder where all the good men have gone.

Underground. Fact: In all but the rarest of situations, women are not as fast as men, as strong as men, and that gap is NOT closing Mr. Moss. Women are equal or better than men in reasoning and brainpower (IMO). But Z beat the boys physically, not with her brains...but, the real reason the rich like women to control the men is that women are (generally) much more submissive to authority than men. So, if you are engineering a target, flatter and empower the female base. Then you control the men they rule.

Some little girl will hear what Moss and others say, will want to play football or fight against the boys, and then will be in for the shock of her life when a boy truly hits her like she is one of the boys. Then she will run home crying, the mother will sue, the boy who hit her will be villified and possibly prosecuted. But, then again, the next generation coming may be so emasculated that they will just roll over...

It's a horse race. There should be no "social message". But once you make one, be prepared for rebuttal.

This ain't the "greatest generation" of your grandfather, baby. Or, like the Russian guy I work with loves to say, "Most American men are wimps and afraid of everything, especially women. And they are stupid, believe everything their government tells them".

He tells me this because he knows I am not the average, dumbed down white male and he respects me. He laughs daily when he sees propaganda that implies women are superior to men mentally and physically in our media. We, on the other hand, are brainwashed that such statements have merit. The poor guy thought he was moving to rugged individualistic America. That was years ago. Now we are like a flock of scared birds, being led around by those who animate this society.

Z beating the boys was special. A SPECIAL girl can compete and sometimes beat the boys. Not girls generally.

IT IS SPECIAL. So, Mr. Moss, treat it that way. Spare those of us here in the horseracing world your political agenda. We get enough of that garbage outside of here. Stop blurring the lines for the young people out there. And you know as well as I do that in the animal kingdom the male of 99 percent of all creatures, and ALL mammals, is physically superior to the female. That is why running with the bulls in Spain is a daredevil sport for fools and drunks while running with the cows is, well, a joke.

So, congrats on the special filly. But leave the social engineering at the door, ok?

It's a horse race, for crying out loud. Not a social statement for the PR guys to exploit the masses over, ok?

End of open letter.

Moss is a globalist and a liberal. No big deal, except when you make social statements tied to racing a horse. What makes Z's victory so special is BECAUSE she beat the boys...NOT because women are as good or better than men. Because even assuming there is some link between horses and humans, if beating the boys was so routine:

...then why is Z beating the boys such a big deal?

See the hypocrisy of that statement? And silly me, I thought Z's victory meant she was a very special horse, regardless of gender. How nice we have those like Moss to remind that this is all about the gender wars and them lining their pockets off the fevor pitch it produces, and the false hope it gives many young girls who want to beat the very best of the boys in football or basketball, or boxing. And it may surprise you to learn that many female athletes and feminists do not approve of this kind of women can beat men marketing. Its exploitive.

And, btw, I have lived around animals of all kind all of my life. In the animal kingdom, the females still want a male stronger and more fierce than they are to breed with them. It's for survival, get it? That is why most animals fight or physically challenge each other before they mate. If the male backs down, he is history.

Then, of course, there is the black widow spider. Is that where next generation is heading? I apologize for going off on this, but I truly resent such statements being made to the general public under the auspices of horseracing. It makes you think that the race, like American society, was itself engineered.

A great horse trainer several decades ago said that the difference in speed between the colts and fillies is minimal, but that even the most enormous of fillies or mares is no match physically for even an average male thoroughbred. Of course, any scientist could tell you that. Yet, to hear those idiots on TV talking, if a mare is bigger than the boys, she can beat them up and outrun them as well.

A filly beating grade 1 males is very special and RARE. Let's treat it that way and keep the social engineering out of it. Zenyatta won. She did not "beat up" any colts, nor did she send any social message. Its a horse race, for crying out loud!

In the new world order, sporting events and even horse races will be making social statements. And the mindless masses will fall for it hook, line and sinker. And the elite will laugh all the way to the bank.